|
Monday, December 2, 1996 at 20:13:18
Jodie Bauman
JBa
|
I really enjoyed this class. Although there
were several things that troubled me. In the
beginning, I thought that this class would be
an easy "A" I was very interested in the
internet, but knew nothing about it. Upon
our first class meeting, I got the idea that
since we would not be meeting, and there were
no tests, this class was a sinch. Well, I
proved myself wrong. What I really fould out
is that this is the type of class I'm not good
at. I need a structed atmosphere with teachers
giving tests and assigning homework(and making
sure you do it). Since nothing was collected
or questioned, I found myself lacking in every
aspect. I waited till the last minute to
read, and 2 weeks ago I found myself on
chapter 2.
Also, I got very stressed out
when missed 2 weeks of school due to an
operation. Since I was not here I could not
do my work. I found myself wishing I had some
take-home homework. This class was a very
interesting experience for me. I found out
a lot aobut myself as well as the computer.
I do have to say though that I have accomplished
everything that I set out to accomplish.
I feel good about all the things that I have
learned, and even though I fell a little
behind, I still enjoyed the learning
experience. If it wasn't for this class,
I would still be asking friends how to do
e-mail.
|
|
Tuesday, November 26, 1996 at 20:42:37
John P.
Zampitella
JZa
|
I am in agreement with the rest of the class I like the web page very
much. I would also like to say to Dan Frank very good job on creating the
web page. I can appreciate all the time and work you put into creating the
page, after I tried to create my own. The web page has come around nicely.
I must admit, I was hesitant about posting my responses for everyone to read,
but I now see how it can be helpful for everyone. It allows everyone to
learn from each other. I did have one suggestion in this area
if possible, I think it might be beneficial to have a place to post comments
just for the professor. I hope the interent becomes something for everyone
to learn from and contribute to in order to better educate the people of the
world.
|
|
Monday, November 25, 1996 at 14:48:50
Daniel Franc
DFr
|
Thanks everybody for the feedback submitted so far. I won't comment on each now, just let me go
back to a very good point raised by Alicia - the redefinition of 'structure' on the Internet really
can make transition of _any_ activity into Cyberspace difficult. It's been twice difficult for you, since
the structure of this online course has been evolving a lot, and it still is changing(a major update will come before
Christmas, hopefully).
As for the lack of the 'social' function of the class, we're working on it and future version of the
online courses will incorporate a Java-based chat room. In more distant future (1-2 semesters) we plan
to use audio technology to enable a _real_ chat.
|
|
Monday, November 25, 1996 at 10:42:44
Alicia A.
Wagner
AWa
|
This is a comment regarding WCU user policies.
User policies are set up and enforced to protect
the personal privacy of the individual or
organization. WCU policies are set up to do
this as well as uphold the general university
codes of conduct. I think it is important to
have clearly defined user policies, because
on the internet you are dealing with a large
and diverse volume of information and people
there has to be some guidelines and security
to follow. When communicating via computer, you
must use the same respect and consideration
as in communicating person to person. These
guidelines have to be more clear cut, because
internet communication is so free and expansive.
|
|
Sunday, November 24, 1996 at 20:12:46
Alicia A.
Wagner
AWa
|
I just wanted to comment about the course and
courses on line in general as opposed to the
usual lecture type class. I think all in all
this course served as a learning experience
for all due to its experimental nature since
we had to challenge our pre-set notions of
what a college course is and the enviroment
were learning takes place.
However, it is
difficult to get used to the idea of not meetin
each week face to face and not having definite
due dates for assignments. Yes, this sounds
like the ideal class, but in reality it
conflicts with the learning enviroment we
have been participating in all our lives as
well as the individual learning patterns each
of us have hopefully developed and understand
by now. An on-line type class forces you to
self motivate and structure your own learning
so you can produce what is needed to complete
the course successfully. We are so used to
prof.'s organizing what we are going to learn,
in what order, and when our assignments will
be due, etc... Now, it is up to the individual.
I think for this course to be taught again
(since our education has not revolutionized to
on-line schooling as of yet or since everyone
in college who will be taking these on-line
courses did not grow up with the virtual
classroom), there should be more structure
imposed by giving due dates and having more
face to face meetings. This will ease the
students who have not been exposed to virtual
classrooms into the experience more easily.
There has to be a combination of structure and
self-motivation by the student to complete
a course in this new cultural experience---
the internet.
|
|
Sunday, November 24, 1996 at 09:52:33
smetros@utk.edu
xxx
|
nice work
|
|
Thursday, November 21, 1996 at 14:17:38
Robert B.
Ross
RRo
|
Although putting the assignments, feedback, disccussions, etc. on the web
page makes things a bit more organized and clear, I think that it is slightly
less conveniant to have to access the web page, search the "work2do" and
feedback sections rather than just checking my email for new messages. Don't
get me wrong, I think that communication through the web has its benefits and
functions, but I don't think that we should make communication via email
obsolete.
|
|
Thursday, November 21, 1996 at 11:17:57
Elisa J.
Garey
EGa
|
I have had no troubles using the web page. It's awsome to be able to do
class work and get assignments, no matter where i wonder off to. Well, as
long as the internet is available. Which it often is. |
|
Thursday, November 21, 1996 at 11:48:50
Daniel Franc
DFr
|
Re the Back Button -- a good point! Actually, this is one of the bugs (or 'unintended features'?) of
Netscape 2 that is used at WCU, Netscape 3 handles it correctly. When going back in Netscape 2 you have to
click again on the Students tab, or try right-clicking when in a student's windows and choosing 'back in frame'
in the menu window that will show up.
As for the feedback page, in the future it is going to have little bit different structure, because we plan
to separate the talk related to the page and the talk related to the course. It's somewhat conflicting when it's all together.
|
|
Wednesday, November 20, 1996 at 22:40:18
Kelly A.
Nevins
KNe
|
I'm in agreement with the rest of the comments
from the class about the SOC491 page. It makes
it much easier to follow the structure of the
class and the assignments due. I really like the
feedback page instead of sending our comments to
Dr. McConatha because then the whole class can
relate or learn something from the other students
comments. What I like most about the SOC491 page
is that any information needed about the course
is just a click away!
|
|
Wednesday, November 20, 1996 at 20:45:59
Jeffrey L.
Cantlin
JCa
|
I am finding that interaction with the class
through this page is going much better than I expected.
I like the idea that if you do not understand
or even have a particular assignment you can
bring it up and take a look at it. At the same time
you can see other students work an either
provide them with or use their information for guidence.
One thing I have a question about is the students section.
Once you have choosen a student and read their bio,
my first instinct is to click on the iocon which
reads BACK. If you do so it will take you to the beginning
of the site, not back so you can choose another student.
Is this how it is supposed to work? Is this
something that can be improved upon?
|
|
Tuesday, November 19, 1996 at 14:49:06
Mike Reese
xxx
|
Greetings. I am a senior in transportation
engineering at North Carolina State University
where I have been employed for the last 3 years
as a web site developer. One of my theses I'm
currently wrapping up concerns the internet and
its effects on society. I am quite pleased to
see that this course is going so well as I have
taken a similar course in the communications
dept. here at NCSU. Best of luck to all of you
as you explore the global communications
link of the future.
|
|
Sunday, November 10, 1996 at 15:00:40
MaryAnne Zampitella
MZa
|
In the latest edition of GW2K, Gateway's Magazine, there are several
interesting articles on technology updates. One is on the relationship
between the computer and the TV in homes and how this is likely to effect
communication (something we've discussed in class). The author of the
article claims that although there has been considerable growth in the number
of computers in American homes, it has not significantly effected television
viewing habits. However, he claims that "the next thirteen ye
ars will drastically alter this relationship between the computer and the
television. Everything from the way programs are made to the method through
which content is delivered to consumers to the hardware consumers view it on
will be dramatically changed by the introduction of technology." Digital
television will produce high-quality shows which will use "more digital
special effects likek real-time 3-D-modeled sets and virtual actors". The
author cites new "pipelines"!
which are being designed and tested for use in the next five years will
deliver any TV program on demand to a computer/TV in the home. "Consumers
will be able to choose to pay for a particular episode of a show and watch
without commercials or watch for free by playing with a few targeted
interactive ads prior to watching the program." To take advantage of this
type of distribution, consumers will need faster PCs, designed specifically
for the family room (which Gateway expects to have available by Dec.
'97) and hard drives with massage storage capability to save the digital
video. To go along with this hardware, "large, high-quality monitors or
viewing devices will also become commonplace". Some observers believe that
the cable companies will be able to deliver simple interfacing capabilities
for this new technology directly to a regular television set. "However, the
tremendous flexibility and innovation of the hyper-competitive computer
industry will leave the cable!
and telephone monopolists working hand-in-hand with hardware and soft
ware manufacturers to redesign the family room of the future."
The hardware for this new family room already exists in labs and should be
available at reasonable prices in 3-4 years; however, interface design will
take longer. "The general populace probably won't adopt these changes for at
least ten years. Cable television took 20 years to reach half the
population and CD players still haven't penetrated half the household after
15 years." For those who live in one of the first-connected areas, this
technology may be ready by 2001.
There are also articles on "Microsoft Office 97 Professional Preview" and the
Destination Big Screen PC (31" monitor, keyless keyboard, remote mouse - now
on the market). If anyone is interested in any of these topics and would
like copies of the articles, I'll be glad to get them to you.
|
|
Sunday, November 10, 1996 at 14:00:40
MaryAnne Zampitella
MZa
|
The WCU World Wide Web Policy states that information should be
provided by designated individuals who are responsible for content and
accuracy. The provider must have written approval of the appropriate
dean/director/department head. Final approval for content is at the
discretion of the University Public Relations Office and Technology Systems.
This policy attempts to ensure that information going on the WCU web page is
appropriate, accurate, non-offensive, and in keeping with the University's
vision of how it wishes to be represented to those visiting its site. Anyone
wishing to post information on the WCU site should be mindful of how their
information could/would be interpreted by others and of the fact that they
are acting as representatives of the University, not as independent
individuals. Information that could be considered appropriate for a person
home page may not be suitable to be included on the University home page.
The University needs to, and does, have final authorization of information provided by departments or
student organizations.
|
|
Sunday, November 10, 1996 at 12:17:38
MaryAnne Zampitella
MZa
|
I agree with Alicia - I think the SOC491 page makes assignments and
communication with class members and Dr. McConatha simple and
straightforward. The assignment page is a great way of tracking assignments
and keeping up to date. I find the page very user friendly and haven't hit
any snags so far.
Daniel, to answer your question about the large graphics, I don't think they
detract from the page at all. I agree that they could be a little smaller,
but I don't know that I would have pinpointed that feature as something
needing to be changed. I think the links you've incorporated make it easy to
get around in the page, and the means of posting messages is clear and
user-friendly. I think you've done an outstanding job.
|
|
Monday, November 4, 1996 at 23:41:28
Alicia A.
Wagner
AWa
|
I like the idea of having a feedback page for
our class. It is easier to keep things organized
through the home-page rater than e-mail for
all the assignments, etc. The home-page is
great though. I also had the question about
the hot word.
|
|
Monday, November 4, 1996 at 14:48:50
Daniel Franc
DFr
|
I did some testing on various platforms and I have a feeling that
the graphics are way too big for the 640x400 resolutions (that are used
by almost all computers at ACC), while they look pretty good on
800x600 screens. I'd really like to hear from you whether
you think that making the buttons and inline "drawings" somewhat smaller
would help the page. I'm not hiding that it will be quite a lot of work,
but it should be done if you think it would be senseful. What's your
opinion???
|
|
Monday, November 4, 1996 at 14:43:51
Daniel Franc
DFr
|
I have question. Is it really true that
none of the people who've been at
this site don't have a favorite site that
has any relation to culture/sociology of
the Internet and that could have been posted
in the Links folder? Or am I just missing
something? May be there is a hidden link where
everyone sends their sites??? Hm......
As for the hot word: it's nothing but a hidden link. A little tease
for the SOC491 students ;) Re feedback tab: I'm somewhat lost -- the
feedback _is_ usable by outsiders... The Links are not, but this may change
in the future.
|
|
Sunday, November 3, 1996 at 17:42:26
velma
xxx
|
Sorry, I hadn't finished my feedback and pushed
the wrong button. The only confusions I have
encountered are related to the "hot words" and
why do you have a tab for feedback that isn't
usable by outsiders?
|
|
Friday, November 1, 1996 at 21:19:42
velma
xxx
|
I'm impressed! I think this is wonderful and a
great beginning. I enjoyed reading about each
person and send jeers to those who "copped out"
with their "nada" prose. MaryAnne hang in there.
I've done it and it's doable! I enjoyed reading
each persons thoughts and congratulate those
who took the risk to share of themselves with
the world. albeit the internet world. Who knows
where this will lead! Keep up the good work!
I love the format. Seeing a binder and lined
pages warms me. This, for me, is a comforting format.
Quite appropriate!
|
|
Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 12:43:51
Daniel Franc
DFr
|
Thanks for the nice words, but don't hesitate also to submit suggestions for improvements. As
for the hidden word - yes, it's tough; so let me give you a hint - on one of the main 7 pages
there is a hidden link (clickable area of the screen), which will reveal the word to you. As
for the starting of the page from MS-Mail, I've sent to all of you the new 'starting' file, so
try that one.
|
|
Thursday, October 31, 1996 at 10:44:52
DR. DOUGLAS
MCCONATHA
DMc
|
I'm pleased to see the feedback that is starting to come in here. I
hope to see all you you at this site by next week. Good luck and Happy
Halloween. NB: Be sure to check the assignment page (work2do) and the News.
|
|
Wednesday, October 30, 1996 at 10:53:37
Jeffrey L.
Cantlin
JCa
|
I have a question. I have problems getting into our page
through the clickable iocon in my e-mail. Is
says, no application is associated with the attached file.
Is this a problem with the page or just the link in my mail?
Does anyone else in the class happen to have the same problem?
|
|
Tuesday, October 29, 1996 at 12:22:29
Jodie Bauman
JBa
|
The text of the feedback belongs here.
I think the page is overall pretty cool. The
only problem for me is the fact that we are
supposed to find a hot word in it somewhere.
I can't seem to be able to find it. I think
that the page is a great idea, and should
make the class more simple. With everything
printed up on the screen, we can never forget
what we have due.
|
|
Sunday, October 27, 1996 at 20:42:33
Jeffrey L.
Cantlin
JCa
|
I would also like to thank Dan for the great work
on this page. This provides a great communication
link for the class.
|
|
Sunday, October 27, 1996 at 11:39:39
MaryAnne Zampitella
MZa
|
I think Dan has done an outstanding job on the SOC491 web page. The
graphics are original and far exceed the quality of many home pages I've seen.
I know the time spent on this has been considerable, and I think he deserves
our thanks and recognition for a terrific job!
|